Tham khảo Độ_tin_cậy_của_Wikipedia

  1. Fatally Flawed: Refuting the recent study on encyclopedic accuracy by the journal Nature Encyclopædia Britannica, March 2006
  2. Giles, J. (2005). “Internet encyclopaedias go head to head: Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries”. Nature. 438 (7070): 900–1. Bibcode:2005Natur.438..900G. doi:10.1038/438900a. PMID 16355180."Wikipedia survives research test". BBC News. BBC. December 15, 2005.
  3. Fernanda B. Viégas, Martin Wattenberg, Kushal Dave: Studying Cooperation and Conflict between Authors with history flow Visualizations. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 575–582, Vienna 2004, ISBN 1-58113-702-8
  4. Giles, J. (2005). “Internet encyclopaedias go head to head: Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries”. Nature. 438 (7070): 900–1. Bibcode:2005Natur.438..900G. doi:10.1038/438900a. PMID 16355180.
  5. “Wikipedia survives research test”. BBC News. BBC. 15 tháng 12 năm 2005.
  6. history flow: results IBM Collaborative User Experience Research Group, 2003
  7. Dorothee Wiegand: "Entdeckungsreise. Digitale Enzyklopädien erklären die Welt." c't 6/2007, March 5, 2007, p. 136-145. Original quote: "Wir haben in den Texten der freien Enzyklopädie nicht mehr Fehler gefunden als in denen der kommerziellen Konkurrenz"
  8. See author acknowledged comments in response to the citation of the Nature study, at PLoS One, 2014, "Citation of fundamentally flawed Nature quality 'study'", In response to T. Yasseri et al. (2012) Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia, Published 20 June 2012, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0038869, see Lưu trữ 2016-01-16 tại Wayback Machine [1], accessed 21 July 2014.
  9. Roy Rosenzweig (tháng 6 năm 2006). “Can History be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past”. The Journal of American History. 93 (1): 117–146. doi:10.2307/4486062. Bản gốc lưu trữ ngày 25 tháng 4 năm 2010. Truy cập ngày 11 tháng 8 năm 2006.
  10. Michael Kurzidim: Wissenswettstreit. Die kostenlose Wikipedia tritt gegen die Marktführer Encarta und Brockhaus an, in: c't 21/2004, October 4, 2004, S. 132–139.
  11. Studying Cooperation and Conflict between Authors with history flow Visualizations, Fernanda et al, CHI 2004, Volume 6, Number 1, April, Vienna, Austria
  12. Charles Seife (2014). Virtual Unreality: Just Because the Internet Told You, how Do You Know It's True?. Penguin Publishing Group. pp. 26–29, 32–34, 201. ISBN 978-0-670-02608-1
  13. PC Pro magazine, August 2007, p. 136, "Wikipedia Uncovered"
  14. Selena Mann: New tool used to evaluate Wikipedia. In: it-World Canada.Truy cập ngày 14 tháng 05 năm 2011.

Tài liệu tham khảo

WikiPedia: Độ_tin_cậy_của_Wikipedia http://corporate.britannica.com/britannica_nature_... http://www.itworldcanada.com/blogs/cooltools/2011/... http://wikipediocracy.com/2014/07/20/how-pranks-ho... http://chnm.gmu.edu/essays-on-history-new-media/es... http://alumni.media.mit.edu/~fviegas/papers/histor... //pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16355180 //doi.org/10.1038%2F438900a //doi.org/10.2307%2F4486062 http://www.plosone.org/annotation/listThread.actio... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4530930.stm